2-3 DESIGN CRITERIA Installation Conditions and Soil Factors
The structural performance of pipe depends on the interaction between
the embedment, or backfill envelope, and the pipe, and is commonly referred
to as pipe/soil interaction. The backfill envelope must provide structural
and drainage characteristics appropriate for the application. Structural
considerations of the backfill include the type of material and compaction
level, dimensions of the backfill envelope, and native soil conditions.
The information presented here is, with few exceptions, consistent with
requirements established in ASTM D2321 Recommended Practice for
Underground Installation of Flexible Thermoplastic Sewer Pipe. Additional
information regarding dimensions of the backfill envelope and native soil
considerations are discussed in more detail in Section 6.
The type of material (sand, gravel, clay, etc.) and compaction level
(standard Proctor density) determine overall strength of the backfill.
As a general rule, material particles that are relatively large and angular
require less compaction than particles that are smaller and rounder to
produce structures having equal strength.
The strength of the backfill can be described using different parameters.
One way is by describing it in terms of the modulus of soil reaction (E),
which is an empirical value developed by the Bureau of Reclamation to
calculate deflection. Table 2-3 presents the E values that result
from different materials and compaction levels. Another parameter used
to describe backfill strength is the secant constrained soil modulus (MS).
Although this property can be measured in the laboratory, values appropriate
for design are shown in Table 2-4. This value must be used in the wall
thrust calculations.
The native soil and other locally available materials should be considered
for backfill. If they meet the criteria of Table 2-3 and Table 2-4, they
may be acceptable materials and should be considered to minimize material
and hauling costs. When in doubt about the appropriate material to use
in an installation, consult a Hancor engineer.
Mechanical compaction is not always necessary; some backfill materials
can be dumped and others can meet minimum compaction criteria simply by
being walked over. On the other hand, mechanical compaction can make placement
of some backfill materials much faster. Additional information regarding
the types of mechanical compactors available and the soil types with which
they work best is located in Section 6.
Another backfill material that has gained in application over the past
few years is flowable fill. This material is similar to a very low strength
concrete. It is poured around the pipe and hardens to form a structure
with an estimated E and Ms value of 3000 psi (20,700
kPa) within two days and 25,000 psi (172,000 kPa) after seven days. In
order to take advantage of the strength of this material, the width of
the trench should be at least twice the pipe diameter and the E
of the native material must be at least 1000 psi. The major disadvantages
of this material are that it can be very costly both in terms of material
costs and installation time, and it will cause the pipe to float if precautions
are not taken. Properly designed and installed, however, it can be used
as an alternative to typical granular backfill. Hancor engineers and some
textbooks can provide additional guidance in the use of this material.
Table 2-3
Modulus of Soil Reaction,
E
Table 2-4
Secant Constrained Soil
Modulus, MS
The way the pipe is seated into the bedding also influences pipe behavior.
The bedding constant term, K, is used to account for the support that
the bedding is providing to the pipe. It is a function of the bedding
angle as shown in Figure 2-1. Table 2-5 lists bedding constants for various
bedding angles. Very commonly, a value of 0.1 is assumed in design.
Table 2-5 Bedding Constants, K
|
Bedding Angle, degrees
|
Bedding Constant
|
|
0
|
0.110
|
|
30
|
0.108
|
|
45
|
0.105
|
|
60
|
0.102
|
|
90
|
0.096
|
|
120
|
0.090
|
|
180
|
0.083
|
Another soil property used in design, the shape factor (Df),
is a function of pipe stiffness, type of backfill material, and the compaction
level. The shape factor relates deflection and bending behaviors. Table
2-6 lists shape factors for a variety of typical installation conditions.
Table 2-6 Shape Factors,
Df
|
|
Gravel
GW, GP, GW-GC, GW-GM,
GP-GC and GP-GM (includes crushed stone)
|
Sand
SW, SP, SM, SC, GM, GC
or mixtures
|
|
Pipe Stiffness, PS(1)
pii (N/m/mm)
|
Dumped to Slight
(< 85% SPD)
|
Moderate to High
(¿ 85%
SPD)
|
Dumped to Slight
(< 85% SPD)
|
Moderate to
High
(¿
85% SPD)
|
|
14 (97)
|
4.9
|
6.2
|
5.4
|
7.2
|
|
16 (110)
|
4.7
|
5.8
|
5.2
|
6.8
|
|
18 (125)
|
4.5
|
5.5
|
5.0
|
6.5
|
|
20 (140)
|
4.4
|
5.4
|
4.9
|
6.4
|
|
22 (150)
|
4.3
|
5.3
|
4.8
|
6.3
|
|
28 (195)
|
4.1
|
4.9
|
4.4
|
5.9
|
|
34 (235)
|
3.9
|
4.6
|
4.1
|
5.6
|
|
35 (240)
|
3.8
|
4.6
|
4.1
|
5.6
|
|
40 (275)
|
3.7
|
4.4
|
3.9
|
5.4
|
|
42 (290)
|
3.7
|
4.4
|
3.9
|
5.3
|
|
50 (345)
|
3.6
|
4.2
|
3.8
|
5.1
|
Notes: 1. Interpolate for intermediate pipe stiffness values.
2. For other backfill materials, use the highest shape factor for the
pipe stiffness.
3. Modified from AWWA Manual M45, p. 42.
DESIGN CRITERIA
|
 |